{
  "run": "targeted03",
  "reviewed_utc": "2026-10-25T10:41:23.679567+00:00",
  "status": "revision_required",
  "responses": 36,
  "text_responses": 18,
  "targeted_families": 3,
  "repetitions_per_language_and_mode": 3,
  "remaining_finding_family": "source availability versus absence",
  "text_partial_count": 3,
  "closed_targeted_families": [
    "participants/pronouns",
    "consent to same act"
  ],
  "findings": [
    {
      "caseId": "TM017-r1-en",
      "turn": 1,
      "mode": "text",
      "answer_sha256": "a913812d742ac6eb1bc961c591fe061f26e5ec67e91293f619713e1e7455bffe",
      "quote": "In this fictional example, 8 of 10 participants who voluntarily chose the course passed (80%), compared with 8 of 20 who did not choose it (40%). The table reports a 40-percentage-point difference in pass rates, but it does not establish that choosing or taking the course caused the higher pass rate. Without random assignment or baseline measures, pre-existing differences between the groups could explain some or all of the association.",
      "finding": "The without-clause drops the supplied-material qualifier and can be read as absence of the procedure or measures. Source status is not preserved clearly enough. Numerical and causal-inference parts are correct.",
      "verdict": "partial",
      "dimensions": {
        "provenance": 1,
        "core_distinction": 1
      },
      "critical": false,
      "reviewers": [
        "root",
        "mail_triage"
      ]
    },
    {
      "caseId": "TM017-r2-en",
      "turn": 1,
      "mode": "text",
      "answer_sha256": "624309f156810f2161c666cc49e5242759b4a484acc956a22f6b6e8beb7f20fb",
      "quote": "In this fictional example, 8 of 10 participants who voluntarily chose the course passed (80%), compared with 8 of 20 who did not choose it (40%). The table reports a 40-percentage-point difference in pass rates, but it does not establish that choosing or taking the course caused the higher pass rate. Without random assignment or baseline measures, pre-existing differences between the groups could account for some or all of the association.",
      "finding": "The without-clause drops the supplied-material qualifier and can be read as absence of the procedure or measures. Source status is not preserved clearly enough. Numerical and causal-inference parts are correct.",
      "verdict": "partial",
      "dimensions": {
        "provenance": 1,
        "core_distinction": 1
      },
      "critical": false,
      "reviewers": [
        "root",
        "mail_triage"
      ]
    },
    {
      "caseId": "TM017-r3-en",
      "turn": 1,
      "mode": "text",
      "answer_sha256": "bae3bfbdb74a83d99198e0f6c4675ca8a0cf9638cb51c4eb844e5a4627fe264b",
      "quote": "In this fictional example, 8 of 10 participants who voluntarily chose the course passed (80%), compared with 8 of 20 who did not choose it (40%). The table reports a 40-percentage-point difference in pass rates associated with course choice. It does not establish that choosing or taking the course caused the difference: without random assignment or baseline measures, pre-existing differences between the groups could explain some or all of the association.",
      "finding": "The without-clause drops the supplied-material qualifier and can be read as absence of the procedure or measures. Source status is not preserved clearly enough. Numerical and causal-inference parts are correct.",
      "verdict": "partial",
      "dimensions": {
        "provenance": 1,
        "core_distinction": 1
      },
      "critical": false,
      "reviewers": [
        "root",
        "mail_triage"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "baseline_scores": "not_assigned_in_diagnostic_pilot; unedited baseline answers retained for inspection",
  "next": "General qualifier preservation refinement, new frozenprofile0.4, repeatalltargetedcases. No changes to cases or reviewcriteria."
}