# Earlier author quotation selection

The 17 passages selected for the earlier author appendix, translated with the original omissions marked. These are retained historical selections, not 17 additional quotations in the current research supplement.

All passages below are English translations. Exact Russian source text and both sets of character ranges are retained in the matching JSON register.

## LQ01 · A12

English range: 1679–1736; end excluded.

```text
Content, accuracy, and the grounds for claims may differ.
```

## LQ02 · A13

English range: 0–207; end excluded.

```text
No, […] differences cannot contain any accuracy because ACCURACY IS A WORD MADE OF LETTERS, show me the referent of accuracy without replacing it with another word? No […] description can be accurate
```

The marked omissions reproduce the earlier selection; the full translated passage is retained in the JSON register and corpus.

## LQ03 · A14

English range: 198–257; end excluded.

```text
This reply contains no separate demonstration of that kind.
```

## LQ04 · A14

English range: 1319–1460; end excluded.

```text
This example is not presented as meeting your demand to show a referent outside writing: what is being compared is precisely what is written.
```

## LQ05 · A18

English range: 547–596; end excluded.

```text
It must not be passed off as a verbatim original.
```

## LQ06 · A18

English range: 1188–1228; end excluded.

```text
removes part of its emotional expression
```

## LQ07 · A19

English range: 0–71; end excluded.

```text
Original is a word made of letters, emotional is a word made of letters
```

## LQ08 · A21

English range: 110–126; end excluded.

```text
The result is me
```

## LQ09 · A25

English range: 165–246; end excluded.

```text
The question is whether the letter I exists apart from any written instance of it
```

## LQ10 · A29

English range: 144–259; end excluded.

```text
I can be fictional, I can belong to AI and I can belong to different people — who will know whose letter “I” it is?
```

## LQ11 · A30

English range: 0–135; end excluded.

```text
Even when the label has been read and the selected assignment of reference is understood, what is written has not become what is named.
```

## LQ12 · A31

English range: 285–531; end excluded.

```text
The word “distinguishing” is a written word, putting it somewhere in a text does not mean distinguishing appears - d i s t i n g u i s h i n g - strokes put together into letters that form the word distinguishing do not become any distinguishing.
```

## LQ13 · A31

English range: 532–602; end excluded.

```text
“отчёта и процедуры” — two written words with the letter и in between.
```

## LQ14 · A31

English range: 899–920; end excluded.

```text
Text belongs in text.
```

## LQ15 · A32

English range: 1869–1929; end excluded.

```text
Ending does not require a final word that permits an ending.
```

## LQ16 · A33

English range: 0–130; end excluded.

```text
And another question, don't you think this research could be left as just the self-check and an explanation 
Or what do you think?
```

## LQ17 · A34

English range: 0–96; end excluded.

```text
And the research could be built around “human and AI” interaction
Meaning I would be the subject
```