[
  {
    "source_id": 1,
    "title": "Record Boundaries: A Source-Order Method for Checking Written Attributions",
    "source_fragment": "§2.1 and the beginning of §2.2, p. 2",
    "source_statement": "In §2.1, a later explanation is kept separate from the original occurrence, even when it repeats the same words. Its content is not retroactively inserted into the earlier record. This is a rule about the order of records, not a conclusion that the later explanation is false.",
    "current_case": "K1, K2, K7",
    "current_application": "In K1, `speaker` is added after `I`; in K2, the quotation frame is kept separate from the quotation; in K7, a question about a cause does not replace the line already presented with a historical answer. An addition may support a reading, but it does not become what was originally written or cease to be an addition.",
    "limit": "The order of the material is not presented as a measured sequence of reading processes.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/record-boundaries/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/record-boundaries-ru.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Границы записи: метод порядка источников для проверки письменных атрибуций",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 2,
    "title": "Reading as Enclosure: A Constructive Separation of Self-Return and Evidential Admission",
    "source_fragment": "§12, especially §§12.1–12.5, p. 16",
    "source_statement": "In §12.4, an explanation is treated as a subsequent record. If its result is fed back as grounds for admitting the very assignment on which it rests, it becomes a candidate for a separately defined structure of self-support. This does not declare every explanation false in advance.",
    "current_case": "K5, K6, K8",
    "current_application": "In K5, the instruction has already prescribed the phrase: treating its appearance as independent evidence of what it names would reuse the prescribed content. K6 directs the analysis to the explanatory word itself. The words `dependence` and `self-support` also remain explanations here, not discovered mechanisms of thought.",
    "limit": "The formal procedure from the earlier work was not run on the present corpus; its specialized statuses are not assigned to these cases.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/reading-as-enclosure/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/reading-as-enclosure/v1.2.3/Reading_as_Enclosure_RU_v1.2.3.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Чтение как клетка: конструктивное разделение самовозврата и доказательного допуска",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 3,
    "title": "“Did You Understand Me?”: What This Record Actually Presents",
    "source_fragment": "§§5.3–5.5, p. 5",
    "source_statement": "Section 5.3 separates three purposes: occurrences and order; assignment to log roles; and a match under a stated criterion. Each extension yields a limited result. The word “understanding” does not, by itself, establish that those results demonstrate understanding.",
    "current_case": "K1, K2, K5",
    "current_application": "K1 and K2 separately consider whom `I` is taken to refer to and who is credited with producing the record. K5 separates the presence of the prepared phrase `I understand you` from a claim about the relation it names. The work develops the analysis of the first person and the distinctions between roles; it does not make a new claim that understanding is impossible.",
    "limit": "Failure to establish a relation is not converted into an established absence of that relation.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/understanding/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/did-you-understand-me-ru.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "«Ты меня понял?»: что именно предъявляет эта запись",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 4,
    "title": "A “View from Outside” Comes Later: How a Particular Record Acquires General Status",
    "source_fragment": "§§6.1–6.4, p. 6",
    "source_statement": "Sections 6.1–6.4 keep a single image, the selection of an external position, and a general result across observers distinct. A caption can alter the proposed reading of an image without becoming a property of the pixels presented earlier.",
    "current_case": "K3, K4",
    "current_application": "K3 compares the report `I feel anxious` with the characterization `I am an anxious person` and the extension `I am always like this`. The connection concerns an expansion in scope: positions and observers in one case, time and characterization in the other. The two domains are not treated as identical.",
    "limit": "The new analogy does not prove that all self-descriptions are mistaken generalizations.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/view-from-outside/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/view-from-outside-ru.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "«Вид со стороны» появляется позже: как частная запись получает общий статус",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 5,
    "title": "The Mathematics Series, Phases 0–7 (“MATHEMATICS REFUTED”). Text used: “A Rocket Does Not Prove Mathematics: A Theorem on the Dependent Status of Application and the Boundary of the ‘It Works’ Argument”",
    "source_fragment": "§8 of the main manuscript, p. 14; also the series page for its contents and public title",
    "source_statement": "From the series of phases 0–7, the passage directly used is §8 of phase 6. There, with values of 102 and 100, a difference of 2 meets a threshold of 2 but not a threshold of 1. The displayed status depends on an added condition, although the compared numerical records remain unchanged.",
    "current_case": "K4, K5; the section on studying responses",
    "current_application": "K5 separates the rule for producing the phrase from the prepared output. In the proposed response study, future codes are to refer to the stated annotation scheme, rather than become the understanding they name. A match under a rule and a claim about a feeling subject cannot be merged through a single result label.",
    "limit": "A particular section is used, not the whole mathematics series. The formal result is not extended to every use of “I” and does not become an external arbiter of reading.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/mathematics-phases-0-7/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/mathematics-phases-0-7/source-7.2.1/Rocket_Does_Not_Prove_Mathematics_Phase6_RU.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Математическая линия, этапы 0–7 («МАТЕМАТИКА ОПРОВЕРГНУТА»). Использованный текст: «Ракета не доказывает математику: теорема зависимого статуса применения и граница аргумента „это работает“»",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 6,
    "title": "Evaluation Never Leaves the Record: Before the Word “Evaluation”—The Boundary Between Checking a Record and Establishing Its Meaning",
    "source_fragment": "§11.1, p. 17",
    "source_statement": "Section 11.1 separates the result of a specified comparison of one hundred carriers from the attribution of agreement, truth, or authority. The number and sameness of those carriers do not, by themselves, add these meanings to the result code.",
    "current_case": "K8; the self-check; the source map; R",
    "current_application": "K8 examines the inscription `the boundary is proved`; the self-check does not designate agreement as success. The same analysis applies to the words `source` and `confirmation`, and to this bibliography. Repetition of the central formulation across several works does not make them independent evidence. In section R, the same analysis is directed at the words “accuracy” and “correspondence” and at the wording of an objection; the description of a change in the question is itself included in the material.",
    "limit": "Neither the number of sources nor a technical match between files replaces an analysis of the present work’s content.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/evaluation/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/evaluation/manuscript/2026-09-02/Otsenka_Ne_Pokidaet_Zapis_RU.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Оценка не покидает запись: до слова «оценка» — граница между проверкой записи и установлением её значения",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 7,
    "title": "A String Has No Authority: A Self-Applying Boundary Between AI Output and the Right to Act",
    "source_fragment": "§§6.2–6.4, p. 19",
    "source_statement": "Section 6.4 distinguishes byte identity, expression of the same proposition, and identical authority. Sections 6.2–6.3 also separate a record’s self-designation from the conditions under which signed material can participate in an action.",
    "current_case": "K2, K5; the contrasting case of action",
    "current_application": "K2 does not infer who produced the record from its use of the first person; K5 does not turn the prescribed `I understand you` into independent evidence. An added `I authorize` would likewise require reference, source, and permitted action to be distinguished. The analysis does not declare every use of text in action impossible.",
    "limit": "The present comparison is not a legal opinion and does not update the regulatory provisions of the earlier work.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/no-authority-in-the-output/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/no-authority-in-the-output/manuscript/2026-08-30/No_Authority_in_the_Output_RU.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Строка не имеет полномочий: самоприменяемая граница между выходом ИИ и правом действовать",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 8,
    "title": "FULL STOP: The Boundary of a Presented Record",
    "source_fragment": "§5.1, p. 4",
    "source_statement": "Section 5.1 extends the boundary to a warranted inference, a definition, and an explanation of meaning. Grounds for relating a sentence to what it names can be discussed; having grounds does not turn the sentence into what it reports.",
    "current_case": "K1–K8; the conclusion; card 6; R",
    "current_application": "Accordingly, neither accepting the self-report in K3–K4 nor adding an explanation in K6 removes the question of written form. The new work does not end with a promise to gather enough information for the letters to become a feeling subject. Its own conclusion receives the same treatment. In section R, the same analysis is directed at the words “accuracy” and “correspondence” and at the wording of an objection; the description of a change in the question is itself included in the material.",
    "limit": "The distinction between form and what is named is not used to prohibit inferences or to deny the usefulness of additional material.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/full-stop/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/full-stop/full-stop-presented-record-boundary-ru.pdf?v=558c81c426bf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "ТОЧКА: граница предъявленной записи",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  },
  {
    "source_id": 9,
    "title": "Inscription and Reading: The Limit of Recording Reading in Writing",
    "source_fragment": "§9, p. 6; §15, pp. 19–20",
    "source_statement": "In §9, a word not individually listed receives no exemption, and stopping the explanation gives its final line no special status. Section 15 already examines the written words rendered here as `I`, `person`, `think`, and `feeling`.",
    "current_case": "R, S, K1–K8",
    "current_application": "Section R addresses the words “accuracy”, “correspondence”, and “task”; section S addresses “original”, “emotional”, and further explanation. The general procedure of applying the analysis to itself is not claimed as new; the material for the comparisons is identified as A11–A20.",
    "limit": "Self-application is not presented as having first appeared in the tenth work. The distinct contribution is limited to these comparisons.",
    "page_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/inscription-and-reading/",
    "pdf_url": "https://beforeword.xyz/research/files/inscription-and-reading/v13/inscription-and-reading-paper-ru.pdf",
    "current_revision_note": "The comparison with the earlier text is retained. The dialogue sections R and S refer to A11–A20; the labels “original” and “emotional” were examined in the selection described by the Russian map, not attributed to the earlier sources. These are historical locators, not sections of the new English N1 manuscript.",
    "source_title_ru": "Начертание и чтение: предел письменной фиксации чтения",
    "title_status": "Descriptive English rendering of the Russian source title.",
    "english_edition_note": "This is a translation of the retained Russian source map, not a new reading of the cited works. English sample words render the Russian examples; they are not verbatim English quotations from a historical dialogue. The original Russian map and historical material are retained in 05_Russian_Edition/beforeword_10_RU_FINAL.zip."
  }
]