{
  "date": "2026-09-30",
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "L01",
      "title": "How to Do Things with Words — selected anthology extracts",
      "authors": "J. L. Austin",
      "year": 1962,
      "kind": "primary philosophical text; later anthology reproduction",
      "url": "https://www.philadelphia.edu.jo/academics/mjayyousi/uploads/How_to_Do_Things_with_Language.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://www.philadelphia.edu.jo/academics/mjayyousi/uploads/How_to_Do_Things_with_Language.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:15:30.603945+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "7936bb37e0e8a91ebfa42cb1f1d7012169e917707a206ce20daf19d9e0b9fa1d",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_austin.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_austin.txt",
      "read_scope": "Opening and felicity conditions in supplied eleven-page anthology excerpt, PDF pp.1–5; not complete 1962 book",
      "claim_locators": "Anthology printed pp.55–59, especially56–59; anthology pagination is not original book pagination",
      "source_account_RU": "Утверждение не исчерпывает употреблений речи. Высказывание может участвовать в совершении действия; успешность зависит от процедуры, участников и обстоятельств.",
      "source_account_EN": "Uttering a sentence may constitute or participate in an action. The excerpt ties successful performances to procedures, participants and circumstances.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Nonidentity does not preclude action performed through utterance.",
      "limits": "No criminal-sanction test or empirical assessment; no claim that all utterances require formal institutions.",
      "web_ref": null,
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L02",
      "title": "On Sense and Reference",
      "authors": "Gottlob Frege; English translation Max Black",
      "year": 1892,
      "kind": "primary philosophical text; university-hosted English reproduction",
      "url": "https://home.sandiego.edu/~baber/metaphysics/readings/Frege.SenseAndReference.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://home.sandiego.edu/~baber/metaphysics/readings/Frege.SenseAndReference.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:21:19.791625+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "392964ac89f32ff0d9477e5c841cf8422d05745398ac8ff5db855e56a2c4a659",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_frege_sandiego.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_frege_sandiego.txt",
      "read_scope": "PDF pp.1–4, corresponding anthology markers pp.22–26; translation and reprint provenance on first page",
      "claim_locators": "PDF pp.1–3; anthology markers pp.23–25; passage on quotation/signs of signs",
      "source_account_RU": "Различает знак, смысл и обозначаемое; цитирование меняет предмет, о котором говорят. Общность смысла не сводится к частному образу читателя.",
      "source_account_EN": "The text distinguishes sign, sense and reference; quotation may make other words the subject. Shared sense is distinguished from an individual mental image.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Distinguishing inscription from reference is compatible with shared, constrained understanding.",
      "limits": "English translation/reprint, not inspected German original; not a theory of punishment.",
      "web_ref": "turn207search48",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L03",
      "title": "Meaning",
      "authors": "H. P. Grice",
      "year": 1957,
      "kind": "primary philosophical journal article; academic-hosted reproduction",
      "url": "https://wstarr.org/teaching/speech_acts/Grice-1957-Meaning.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://wstarr.org/teaching/speech_acts/Grice-1957-Meaning.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:18:05.794092+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "25effc437b798695026a9828eb84ddf194469f6317b0521c94f58c5626a6e461",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_grice.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_grice.txt",
      "read_scope": "Selected passages pp.377–379,383–384,386–388, including caveats about intentions; remaining pages not claimed read in full",
      "claim_locators": "Philosophical Review66(3), pp.377–379,382–384,386–388",
      "source_account_RU": "Различает естественное и неестественное значение; во втором случае анализирует намерение и его узнавание адресатом. Это аналитическая модель, не обнаружение умысла обвиняемого.",
      "source_account_EN": "The article distinguishes natural from nonnatural meaning and analyses communicative intention and audience recognition. It does not ascertain any defendant’s mental state.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "An inscription can intentionally influence a hearer without becoming its referent.",
      "limits": "Conceptual proposal with stated qualifications; not a universally necessary criminal mens rea test.",
      "web_ref": "turn206search47",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L04",
      "title": "A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts",
      "authors": "John R. Searle",
      "year": 1975,
      "kind": "primary philosophical book chapter; university-hosted scan",
      "url": "https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/f07/pragmatics/searle75a.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://semantics.uchicago.edu/kennedy/classes/f07/pragmatics/searle75a.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:18:05.795002+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "25d52d8a7cbdbde4ccd6896eb1ba98fe7ba735f5afbc88ab3b286cbbafeed213",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_searle.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_searle_reviewed.txt",
      "read_scope": "Publication pages and chapter pp.344–347,350–351,358–361; OCR after rotating sideways scan; not a full reading of pp.344–369",
      "claim_locators": "In Keith Gunderson(ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies VII; pp.344–347 and358–361",
      "source_account_RU": "Различает глаголы речевых действий и сами действия. Декларации могут создавать институциональный статус; фактическое утверждение судьи всё ещё проверяемо.",
      "source_account_EN": "The chapter separates verbs from acts. Successful declarations can create institutional status, while a judge’s factual claim remains assessable against the facts.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Institutional effect can occur through communication although the signs remain signs.",
      "limits": "1975 chapter, not the related 1976 article; its exceptions concerning linguistic declarations do not exempt any word from the project’s inscription boundary.",
      "web_ref": "turn206search48",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L05",
      "title": "Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts",
      "authors": "Rae Langton",
      "year": 1993,
      "kind": "primary philosophical journal article; author-hosted scan",
      "url": "https://web.mit.edu/langton/www/pubs/SpeechActs.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://web.mit.edu/langton/www/pubs/SpeechActs.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:15:30.605895+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "816747f3a354a8be03f5f40a4ef98140ecbce3fd67e4a2db29c80008b8e97d54",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_langton.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_langton_reviewed.txt",
      "read_scope": "Printed pp.293–304 (first twelve PDF pages), OCR; p.299 separately re-rendered; later silencing section not claimed read",
      "claim_locators": "Philosophy & Public Affairs22(4), pp.293–304; especially296–300,303–304",
      "source_account_RU": "Рассматривает речевые действия подчинения и власти. Признаёт разрыв между состоятельностью такого анализа и самостоятельным обоснованием цензуры.",
      "source_account_EN": "The opening develops speech-act accounts of subordination and authority, while expressly recognising a gap between their defensibility and justification of censorship.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Speech may participate in oppressive relations; protecting speakers also requires attention to recipients’ ability to speak.",
      "limits": "Conceptual argument conditioned by empirical assumptions; no general criminal-imprisonment conclusion; no claim that later sections were read.",
      "web_ref": "turn204search50",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L06",
      "title": "Judicial Decisions and Linguistic Analysis: Is There a Linguist in the Court?",
      "authors": "Lawrence M. Solan",
      "year": 1995,
      "kind": "primary legal-linguistic journal article",
      "url": "https://journals.library.wustl.edu/lawreview/article/4049/galley/20882/download/",
      "final_url": "https://journals.library.wustl.edu/lawreview/article/4049/galley/20882/download/",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:15:30.604648+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "4592f30ba494f88ebc68cbdbb1e3a385a47ba1db5748a095ca51cf82b7ba160c",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_solan.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_solan.txt",
      "read_scope": "Printed pp.1069–1072",
      "claim_locators": "Washington University Law Quarterly73, pp.1069–1072",
      "source_account_RU": "Лингвистика не диктует суду значение; может помогать объяснять интерпретацию и выявлять неудачное рассуждение о языке.",
      "source_account_EN": "Linguistics does not dictate judicial interpretation, but may improve explanations of interpretation and expose defective analysis of language.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Ordinary linguistic competence and interpretive constraints are compatible with requiring explicit reasons.",
      "limits": "No empirical error rate or assertion that judicial interpretations are arbitrary.",
      "web_ref": null,
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L07",
      "title": "CuRIAM: Corpus re Interpretation and Metalanguage in U.S. Supreme Court Opinions",
      "authors": "Michael Kranzlein; Nathan Schneider; Kevin Tobia",
      "year": 2024,
      "kind": "primary corpus/annotation research paper",
      "url": "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.379.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.379.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:15:30.605203+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "d4522fd9caaf96a5ac162d7962c0915a9f07af589bed0b892387ca268e0de6e2",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_curiam.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_curiam.txt",
      "read_scope": "Introduction; §3.1 and Table1, printed pp.4247–4250; empirical results not used to infer correctness",
      "claim_locators": "LREC-COLING2024; §3.1, Table1, pp.4249–4250",
      "source_account_RU": "Схема отмечает обсуждаемые термины, определения, цитаты, источники и интерпретационные аргументы. Это разметка судебного метаязыка, а не вердикт об истинности.",
      "source_account_EN": "Its scheme annotates terms, definitions, quotations, sources and interpretive arguments. Annotation of judicial metalanguage does not establish a ruling’s truth.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Public inspection can distinguish different textual roles instead of treating every passage alike.",
      "limits": "Statutory-interpretation corpus; scheme requires adaptation to speech prosecutions, and annotation is itself contestable.",
      "web_ref": null,
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L08",
      "title": "Speech as Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses of Conduct, “Situation-Altering Utterances,” and the Uncharted Zones",
      "authors": "Eugene Volokh",
      "year": 2005,
      "kind": "primary legal scholarship; author-hosted full article",
      "url": "https://www2.law.ucla.edu/Volokh/conduct.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://www2.law.ucla.edu/Volokh/conduct.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:18:05.796113+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "0ac888d1ca39ea5b1f6ec8d84d9ec7838b86c5e7d34307c175fbcdb88ead0ee8",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_volokh.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_volokh.txt",
      "read_scope": "Selected opening passages pp.1278–1279; III selected passages pp.1328–1329,1334–1335; conclusion p.1348; no claim to full-article reading",
      "claim_locators": "Cornell Law Review90, pp.1326–1335,1347–1348; especially1334–1335",
      "source_account_RU": "Не считает переименование речи в поведение достаточным. Допускает некоторые ограничения речи, требуя разбирать категории и вред как ограничения речи.",
      "source_account_EN": "Renaming speech as conduct is insufficient; some speech restrictions may nevertheless be justified through defined categories and analysis of harm.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Some communications can be restrictable even while recognised as speech.",
      "limits": "U.S. doctrinal argument as of2005, not current worldwide law; query erroneously used2014, retained in log.",
      "web_ref": "turn207search46",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L09",
      "title": "The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — chapter5, The Crime Prevention Effects of Incarceration",
      "authors": "National Research Council; committee report; Jeremy Travis, Bruce Western, Steve Redburn(eds.)",
      "year": 2014,
      "kind": "official authored multidisciplinary evidence review",
      "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/18613/chapter/7",
      "final_url": "https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/18613/chapter/7",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:17:00.653158+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "0dea817fc701633c7f1df88c694ae17b8bf463cfce82ba7eb6d41c8ed61db2b0",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_nrc.html",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_nrc.txt",
      "read_scope": "Selected passages within printed chapter5: deterrence pp.133–140, incapacitation pp.140–144, conclusion pp.155–156; not every passage or cited underlying study",
      "claim_locators": "Printed pp.139–145,155–156; website path /chapter/7 denotes printed chapter5",
      "source_account_RU": "Различает сдерживание и изоляцию; дополнительные длительные сроки дают ограниченное сдерживание. Допускает профилактическую пользу целевой изоляции опасных частых нарушителей.",
      "source_account_EN": "The chapter separates deterrence from incapacitation: longer already-lengthy sentences yield limited additional deterrence, while targeted incapacitation may prevent serious offending.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "The review does not deny substantial prevention benefits from some targeted imprisonment policies.",
      "limits": "Broad crime evidence, not trials of imprisonment for communication; magnitude and causal identification remain uncertain; web chapter path is not print chapter number.",
      "web_ref": "turn207search0",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L10",
      "title": "The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism",
      "authors": "Paul Gendreau; Claire Goggin; Francis T. Cullen",
      "year": 1999,
      "kind": "officially hosted authored meta-analytic report1999-3",
      "url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ffcts-prsn-sntncs-rcdvsm/index-en.aspx",
      "final_url": "https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ffcts-prsn-sntncs-rcdvsm/index-en.aspx",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:17:00.648960+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "a91dcb87e3d0dff6205fbe9726430a4d48f8d4cea3807c56cd31b376b78439f3",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_canada.html",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_canada.txt",
      "read_scope": "Executive Summary; Method; Description of Studies; Effects on Recidivism; Discussion; references not individually read",
      "claim_locators": "Section Method/Sample of Studies; Results/Effects on Recidivism and Table1; Discussion",
      "source_account_RU": "В обзоре50 исследований нет снижения повторных нарушений от более долгого заключения. В сравнении с общественными санкциями взвешенный эффект равен нулю; дизайн ограничен.",
      "source_account_EN": "Across50 studies longer imprisonment did not reduce recidivism; the weighted custody/community comparison was null. Study designs limit causal conclusions.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Authors retain incapacitation/retribution as possible rationales; null postrelease deterrence does not refute every punishment rationale.",
      "limits": "Older heterogeneous largely observational studies, not speech-offence-specific; report’s views are authors’ views, not necessarily government policy.",
      "web_ref": "turn204search41",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L11",
      "title": "Five Things About Deterrence",
      "authors": "National Institute of Justice",
      "year": 2016,
      "kind": "official short research summary; not an independent empirical study",
      "url": "https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247350.pdf",
      "final_url": "https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247350.pdf",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:17:00.652325+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "cf5c508df3f928a875660fa6ab4242b4576951911af421cb703abbd0a37fff99",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_nij_pdf.pdf",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/candidate_nij_pdf.txt",
      "read_scope": "Entire two-page PDF including addendum; corresponding HTML article also read",
      "claim_locators": "May2016, NCJ247350; p.1 points1–4; p.2 addendum and Deterrence and Incapacitation",
      "source_account_RU": "Сводка отдаёт большее значение вероятности задержания, чем усилению наказания. Дополнение сохраняет наказание и изоляцию как самостоятельные цели, отличные от сдерживания.",
      "source_account_EN": "The summary places greater deterrent weight on apprehension certainty than severity. Its addendum preserves punishment and incapacitation as distinct sentencing purposes.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "The addendum allows some short sentences to deter and keeps punishment/incapacitation separate.",
      "limits": "Based substantially on Nagin’s review, not independent replication; Nagin’s full article was not obtained and is not represented as read.",
      "web_ref": "turn204search0",
      "quoted_words": 0
    },
    {
      "id": "L12",
      "title": "General comment No.34: Article19, Freedoms of opinion and expression",
      "authors": "UN Human Rights Committee",
      "year": 2011,
      "kind": "primary official interpretive document",
      "url": "https://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=GPUalULvc0ZZti885Lu25QgKWvSbotKhPB2a5LVU4GLkJMwM1TwbdnU7budj9bwVSuZOYoIaIPAK8OCZ8pDWPg%3D%3D",
      "final_url": "https://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=GPUalULvc0ZZti885Lu25QgKWvSbotKhPB2a5LVU4GLkJMwM1TwbdnU7budj9bwVSuZOYoIaIPAK8OCZ8pDWPg%3D%3D",
      "checked_at_utc": "2026-09-30T06:15:31.366389+00:00",
      "access_status": 200,
      "sha256": "0857666f106d36ec175f0a966dd2dcb229cb7cb0e07a1027d5874ad15e59e740",
      "local_full_text": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_gc34.html",
      "local_extraction": "analysis/phase4/literature_raw/seed_gc34.txt",
      "read_scope": "§§21–25,34–35,46–52; full public document available; decoded UTF-16 BOM",
      "claim_locators": "CCPR/C/GC/34,12September2011; §§22,25,34–35,47,50–52",
      "source_account_RU": "Требует определённости, необходимости и соразмерности ограничений. В§47 отвергает заключение за диффамацию;§§50–52 сохраняют отдельную роль запретов статьи20.",
      "source_account_EN": "It requires precise, necessary and proportionate restrictions;§47 rejects imprisonment for defamation, while§§50–52 preserve Article20’s distinct prohibition requirements.",
      "strongest_adverse_point": "Some expression prohibitions are required; defamation guidance cannot be expanded into universal existing immunity.",
      "limits": "Interpretive authority, not new global criminal code or empirical evidence; §47 is limited to defamation.",
      "web_ref": null,
      "quoted_words": 0
    }
  ],
  "notes": [
    "L identifiers temporary; map on integration.",
    "Zero substantive verbatim quotations; short RU/EN source accounts deliberately bounded.",
    "Read-scope statements are narrower than file availability."
  ]
}