The register contains 56 entries. Language versions of one judgment may occupy separate rows, but still count as one judicial act. The judicial corpus contains 14 case groups, 17 base judicial acts and two compliance orders. Academic and legislative material does not increase the case count.
A URL does not certify what it points to. Each entry identifies the version, passage and source layer used, together with limits on access. Historical access descriptions are retained as records of that work; they do not claim that every link was opened again for this language edit.
S01 · Dmitriyevskiy v Russia
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court judgment reproduced material |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2017-10-03 |
| Reading scope | Judicial English reproduction; fresh local reread of §§7–8, opening of9,21,37–38,105–108,110–118. Complete PDF obtained; full selected judgment read in earlier corpus work. |
| Location | §§7–9,21,37–38,105,108,113–118 |
| Limit | Russian newspaper originals and the complete linguistic expert report were not independently obtained; no worldwide absence claim. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S02 · Dmitriyevskiy official press release
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court secretariat summary |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2017-10-03 |
| Reading scope | full press release |
| Location | pp 1–3 |
| Limit | Used for sentence description; not a judgment substitute |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S03 · Stomakhin v Russia
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judgment PDF on reproduction host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2018-05-09 |
| Reading scope | full selected judgment |
| Location | 14; 62; 65; 97–134, especially 128–129; Keller separate opinion 9–12 |
| Limit | Domestic originals and exhibits not separately obtained |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S04 · Counterman v Colorado
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court-host opinion PDF; earlier FIRE reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2023-06-27 |
| Reading scope | Fresh local reread of the complete majority, printed pp1–14, Parts I–III and footnotes1–7. Separate opinions were read in the earlier reproduced corpus, not freshly reread in phase4. |
| Location | Majority Parts I–III, printed pp1–14, especially PartI footnote1 and PartIII |
| Limit | Original Facebook files and post-new-trial outcome not established. Fresh phase4 reading is local of the court PDF already obtained, not a new web retrieval. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S05 · People v Counterman
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court opinion reproduced on Justia |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2024-06-13 |
| Reading scope | Complete reproduced judicial body freshly read from root web output, rendered lines47–81, §§1–18 and footnotes1–4; no reliance on the optional AI metadata summary. |
| Location | Title/announcement13June2024; §§1,6–12,13–18, footnote4 |
| Limit | Direct Justia CLI returned403. Root web full body succeeds. Colorado research URL returned a JS application shell, not judgment text. Actual execution and later retrial disposition not established. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S06 · Brandenburg v Ohio
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official US Reports scan on Library of Congress |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1969-06-09 |
| Reading scope | Fresh local complete read of the Library of Congress US Reports scan: per curiam pp444–449 and separate concurrences pp449–457. |
| Location | 395 US444–449; separate concurrences449–457 |
| Limit | Films and physical exhibits not independently obtained; actual time served not established. Same opinion as S06, a more direct primary-host copy. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S07 · Chambers v DPP
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | approved court judgment official host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2012-07-27 |
| Reading scope | Complete approved PDF obtained; fresh local reread §§1–9,11–18,20–38. Full selected judgment read in prior audit. |
| Location | §§11–18,24–25,30–38, especially34–35 |
| Limit | Tweet digital original and separate lower-court record not obtained. The PDF does not establish original fine amount or imprisonment served. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S08 · Cobban and Borders v DPP
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | approved court judgment official host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2024-07-26 |
| Reading scope | Complete approved PDF obtained; fresh local reread §§6–14,101–112,123–129 and selected passages within49–77, especially63–73; full selected judgment read in prior audit. |
| Location | §§6–8,10–14,63–73,102–111,113–129 |
| Limit | Original WhatsApp files and sentencing-execution record not obtained. Bail pending this appeal is established; actual execution is not. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S09 · Wunsiedel 1 BvR 2150/08
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | German constitutional decision reproduction |
| Language | de |
| Document date | 2009-11-04 |
| Reading scope | Full German judicial reproduction obtained. Fresh local reread of German Rn64–67,77–81,93–95,104–110; full Rn1–110 read in earlier corpus work. |
| Location | German Rn64–67,77–81,93–95,104–110 |
| Limit | Official German domain timed out in this pass; earlier access attempts failed. Full reproduction is used, not English extract numbering. This is an assembly ban, not an imposed personal prison sentence. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S10 · Eon v France
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court judgment official HUDOC full French text |
| Language | fr |
| Document date | 2013-03-14 |
| Reading scope | Complete full French judgment PDF obtained. Fresh local reread §§6–11,53–62; full judgment and separate opinions read in earlier corpus work. |
| Location | §§6–11,53,55,57–62; operative disposition |
| Limit | Domestic reasons are judicially reproduced, not independently obtained national originals. General offence compatibility and present law not determined by this case comparison. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S11 · UN Human Rights Committee — General comment No.34: Article19, Freedoms of opinion and expression
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary official interpretive document |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2011 |
| Reading scope | §§21–25,34–35,46–52; full public document available; decoded UTF-16 BOM |
| Location | CCPR/C/GC/34,12September2011; §§22,25,34–35,47,50–52 |
| Limit | Interpretive authority, not new global criminal code or empirical evidence; §47 is limited to defamation. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S12 · Communications Act 2003, section 127
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and all attached annotations read. |
| Location | s127(1), (2)(c), (3), (7); territorially retained repeal text at (2)(a)–(b); commencement annotations |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S13 · Online Safety Act 2023, section 181
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and all attached annotations read. |
| Location | s181(1)–(5); especially (5)(a),(c); commencement annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S14 · Russia ceases to be party to the Convention
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | Council of Europe institutional notice |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2022-09-16 |
| Reading scope | full notice |
| Location | cessation and temporal competence statements |
| Limit | Historical notice; case-specific current procedure requires separate review |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S15 · beforeword previous research
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | user-supplied website archive plus live-page version comparison |
| Language | ru |
| Document date | archive 2026-09-28 |
| Reading scope | 13 archive research texts read; 13 live pages retrieved and compared |
| Location | 13 works mapped in previous_research |
| Limit | All 13 linked pages accessible in direct retrieval; 12 HTML files byte-identical to archive; human differs and the mapped claim remains tied to the archived version |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S16 · Shreya Singhal v Union of India
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2015-03-24 |
| Reading scope | full selected judicial text and any attached ROP |
| Location | 1; 13; 27-28; 48-49; 69-82; 79-82; 83-90; 91-92; 119 |
| Limit | Court text reproduced on third-party host; no original criminal post by the petitioner is presented as obtained; no full current-law survey |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S17 · Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2022-10-12 |
| Reading scope | full selected judicial text and any attached ROP |
| Location | signed order pages 1-2, requests (a)-(c); signed order page 3, unnumbered paragraph preceding directions; signed order pages 3-5, directions (a)-(e); direction (d) |
| Limit | Directions are not evidence of complete execution; no quantified enforcement outcome is claimed |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S18 · Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam & Anr — larger-bench reference
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2023-03-24 |
| Reading scope | full selected judicial text and any attached ROP |
| Location | Shah §§2.4, 10.1–10.8; Shah §10.3; Shah §§3–9.4; do not attribute submissions directly to the court; Shah §§14.4–14.6; Shah §§16.1, 17–17.1; Shah §18; Karol §§8, 21–22, 50; Karol §§48–53 |
| Limit | Doctrinal reference about continued membership, not a fresh conviction for an isolated utterance.; No blanket finding that Shreya Singhal was overruled.; Section 10(a)(i) and terrorist-organisation provisions such as section 38 must not be collapsed.; Two years is the statutory maximum described, not a sentence imposed on Arup by this act.; Do not treat continuing membership as established merely because the criterion permits punishment. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S19 · Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam & Anr — disposal and Record of Proceedings
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2023-09-21 |
| Reading scope | full selected judicial text and any attached ROP |
| Location | Signed order §§1–4; Signed order §2; ROP block CRL.M.P.16637/2014 §§2–5; ROP block SLP5971/5643/5964/6270-2019 §§6–8 |
| Limit | No new sentence on Arup; no claim about actual historical time served.; Preserving individual acquittals is distinct from reversing the March doctrine.; Paragraph numbers restart in separate ROP blocks.; Reproduction has 29.08.2024 in CRL.M.P.16637/2014 §4 but 29.08.2014 in §2; date discrepancy not silently corrected. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S20 · Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission and Another
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2021-07-30 |
| Reading scope | HTML judgment, paragraphs 1–198, order, footnotes 1–210 |
| Location | 3–4; 14–18, 179–180; 96–101; 107–112, 187–190; 115; 165–182; 191–198; order |
| Limit | SAFLII main and www3 HTML/PDF requests unavailable (403 or retrieval errors); Official revised PDF initially recognised as 84 pages; repeated body retrieval returned 404; Newspaper original, complete trial testimony and expert report not independently obtained; Current legislation after the judgment's temporary regime not investigated; judgment stamp 30 July, reproduction heading 31 July; revised official PDF not fully read |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S21 · Momberg v S
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | judicial text reproduced on third-party host |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2019-06-28 |
| Reading scope | HTML judgment, paragraphs 1–35 including repeated paragraph 30, signatures, footnotes 1–19 |
| Location | 1; 2; 5–11; 15–23; 20; 24–34; 35 |
| Limit | SAFLII HTML/PDF requests unavailable; Initial Magistrate's Court judgment not independently retrieved; Recordings not independently obtained; Imprisonment execution and actual time served unknown |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S22 · Kimel v. Argentina ES
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court-host judgment PDF; byte-identical CEJIL reproduction |
| Language | es |
| Document date | 2008-05-02 |
| Reading scope | full selected judgment and appended opinions |
| Location | 41–50; 63–95; 97; 123; 128; 140 |
| Limit | Court-host PDF obtained during the earlier audit and matched byte-for-byte to the read CEJIL copy. Book and national originals not separately obtained. Subsequent compliance outcome is examined through S29, a distinct source. Retain source-language legal labels. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S23 · Kimel v. Argentina EN
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court-host judgment PDF; byte-identical CEJIL reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2008-05-02 |
| Reading scope | full selected judgment and appended opinions |
| Location | 41–50; 63–95; 97; 123; 128; 140 |
| Limit | Court-host PDF obtained during the earlier audit and matched byte-for-byte to the read CEJIL copy. Book and national originals not separately obtained. Subsequent compliance outcome is examined through S29, a distinct source. Retain source-language legal labels. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S24 · Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay ES
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court-host judgment PDF; byte-identical CEJIL reproduction |
| Language | es |
| Document date | 2004-08-31 |
| Reading scope | full selected judgment and appended opinions |
| Location | 69.7/69(7); 69.10/69(10); 69.15/69(15); 69.20/69(20); 69.49/69(49); 95–108; 153–162; 182–187; 223 |
| Limit | Court-host PDF obtained during the earlier audit and matched byte-for-byte to the read CEJIL copy. National originals and independent prison records not obtained. The judgment itself expressly records that the imposed sanctions were not executed (§69.49/69(49), §162); that judicial account is the disclosed basis. Subsequent compliance outcome is examined through S30, a distinct source. Retain source-language legal labels. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S25 · Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay EN
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court-host judgment PDF; byte-identical CEJIL reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2004-08-31 |
| Reading scope | full selected judgment and appended opinions |
| Location | 69.7/69(7); 69.10/69(10); 69.15/69(15); 69.20/69(20); 69.49/69(49); 95–108; 153–162; 182–187; 223 |
| Limit | Court-host PDF obtained during the earlier audit and matched byte-for-byte to the read CEJIL copy. National originals and independent prison records not obtained. The judgment itself expressly records that the imposed sanctions were not executed (§69.49/69(49), §162); that judicial account is the disclosed basis. Subsequent compliance outcome is examined through S30, a distinct source. Retain source-language legal labels. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S26 · J. L. Austin — How to Do Things with Words — selected anthology extracts
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary philosophical text; later anthology reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1962 |
| Reading scope | Opening and felicity conditions in supplied eleven-page anthology excerpt, PDF pp.1–5; not complete 1962 book |
| Location | Anthology printed pp.55–59, especially56–59; anthology pagination is not original book pagination |
| Limit | No criminal-sanction test or empirical assessment; no claim that all utterances require formal institutions. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S27 · Lawrence M. Solan — Judicial Decisions and Linguistic Analysis: Is There a Linguist in the Court?
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary legal-linguistic journal article |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1995 |
| Reading scope | Printed pp.1069–1072 |
| Location | Washington University Law Quarterly73, pp.1069–1072 |
| Limit | No empirical error rate or assertion that judicial interpretations are arbitrary. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S28 · Michael Kranzlein; Nathan Schneider; Kevin Tobia — CuRIAM: Corpus re Interpretation and Metalanguage in U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary corpus/annotation research paper |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2024 |
| Reading scope | Introduction; §3.1 and Table1, printed pp.4247–4250; empirical results not used to infer correctness |
| Location | LREC-COLING2024; §3.1, Table1, pp.4249–4250 |
| Limit | Statutory-interpretation corpus; scheme requires adaptation to speech prosecutions, and annotation is itself contestable. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S29 · Caso Kimel Vs. Argentina — Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencia
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court resolution PDF reproduced by CEJIL |
| Language | es |
| Document date | 2013-02-05 |
| Reading scope | Complete 8-page judicial resolution |
| Location | Visto 2–3; considerandos 5–14, especially 11–13; DECLARA 1; RESUELVE 1–2 |
| Limit | Official URL returned 403. Court-authored primary text read at CEJIL. The underlying 10 November 2011 national review judgment was not separately obtained. Dated compliance conclusion, not a claim of an exhaustive later-act search. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S30 · Caso Ricardo Canese Vs. Paraguay — Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencia
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | court resolution PDF reproduced by CEJIL |
| Language | es |
| Document date | 2008-08-06 |
| Reading scope | Complete 7-page judicial resolution |
| Location | Visto 3,10–11; considerandos 8–12; DECLARA 1; RESUELVE 1–2 |
| Limit | Court-authored primary resolution reproduced by CEJIL; not an independent archive of payments or original correspondence. Case closure followed waiver of remaining default interest, not proof that the interest was paid. Earlier 6 February 2008 resolution is described within this text, not independently read in this pass. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S31 · Gottlob Frege; English translation Max Black — On Sense and Reference
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary philosophical text; university-hosted English reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1892 |
| Reading scope | PDF pp.1–4, corresponding anthology markers pp.22–26; translation and reprint provenance on first page |
| Location | PDF pp.1–3; anthology markers pp.23–25; passage on quotation/signs of signs |
| Limit | English translation/reprint, not inspected German original; not a theory of punishment. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S32 · H. P. Grice — Meaning
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary philosophical journal article; academic-hosted reproduction |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1957 |
| Reading scope | Selected passages pp.377–379,383–384,386–388, including caveats about intentions; remaining pages not claimed read in full |
| Location | Philosophical Review66(3), pp.377–379,382–384,386–388 |
| Limit | Conceptual proposal with stated qualifications; not a universally necessary criminal mens rea test. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S33 · John R. Searle — A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary philosophical book chapter; university-hosted scan |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1975 |
| Reading scope | Publication pages and chapter pp.344–347,350–351,358–361; OCR after rotating sideways scan; not a full reading of pp.344–369 |
| Location | In Keith Gunderson(ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minnesota Studies VII; pp.344–347 and358–361 |
| Limit | 1975 chapter, not the related 1976 article; its exceptions concerning linguistic declarations do not exempt any word from the project’s inscription boundary. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S34 · Rae Langton — Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary philosophical journal article; author-hosted scan |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1993 |
| Reading scope | Printed pp.293–304 (first twelve PDF pages), OCR; p.299 separately re-rendered; later silencing section not claimed read |
| Location | Philosophy & Public Affairs22(4), pp.293–304; especially296–300,303–304 |
| Limit | Conceptual argument conditioned by empirical assumptions; no general criminal-imprisonment conclusion; no claim that later sections were read. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S35 · Eugene Volokh — Speech as Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses of Conduct, “Situation-Altering Utterances,” and the Uncharted Zones
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | primary legal scholarship; author-hosted full article |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2005 |
| Reading scope | Selected opening passages pp.1278–1279; III selected passages pp.1328–1329,1334–1335; conclusion p.1348; no claim to full-article reading |
| Location | Cornell Law Review90, pp.1326–1335,1347–1348; especially1334–1335 |
| Limit | U.S. doctrinal argument as of2005, not current worldwide law; query erroneously used2014, retained in log. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S36 · National Research Council; committee report; Jeremy Travis, Bruce Western, Steve Redburn(eds.) — The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences — chapter5, The Crime Prevention Effects of Incarceration
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official authored multidisciplinary evidence review |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2014 |
| Reading scope | Selected passages within printed chapter5: deterrence pp.133–140, incapacitation pp.140–144, conclusion pp.155–156; not every passage or cited underlying study |
| Location | Printed pp.139–145,155–156; website path /chapter/7 denotes printed chapter5 |
| Limit | Broad crime evidence, not trials of imprisonment for communication; magnitude and causal identification remain uncertain; web chapter path is not print chapter number. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S37 · Paul Gendreau; Claire Goggin; Francis T. Cullen — The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | officially hosted authored meta-analytic report1999-3 |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 1999 |
| Reading scope | Executive Summary; Method; Description of Studies; Effects on Recidivism; Discussion; references not individually read |
| Location | Section Method/Sample of Studies; Results/Effects on Recidivism and Table1; Discussion |
| Limit | Older heterogeneous largely observational studies, not speech-offence-specific; report’s views are authors’ views, not necessarily government policy. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S38 · National Institute of Justice — Five Things About Deterrence
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official short research summary; not an independent empirical study |
| Language | en |
| Document date | 2016 |
| Reading scope | Entire two-page PDF including addendum; corresponding HTML article also read |
| Location | May2016, NCJ247350; p.1 points1–4; p.2 addendum and Deterrence and Incapacitation |
| Limit | Based substantially on Nagin’s review, not independent replication; Nagin’s full article was not obtained and is not represented as read. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S39 · Online Safety Act 2023, section 182
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and all attached annotations read. |
| Location | s182(1)–(7); commencement annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S40 · Online Safety Act 2023, section 189
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and all attached annotations read. |
| Location | s189(1)–(3); especially (2); commencement annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S41 · Online Safety Act 2023 (Commencement No. 3) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/31
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official made statutory instrument |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full regulations and explanatory material read. |
| Location | regs1–2; explanatory note; earlier-commencement table |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S42 · Sentencing Act 2020, section 222
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and attached annotations read. |
| Location | s222(1)–(2); commencement annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S43 · Contempt of Court Act 1981, section 14
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and attached annotations read. |
| Location | s14(1)–(2); other selected section paragraphs read |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S44 · Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 24
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and relevant substitution annotation read. |
| Location | s24(1)–(5); substitution annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S45 · Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 37
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and selected metadata/annotations read; not every act-wide application note. |
| Location | s37, especially (1)–(4); full body read |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S46 · Bail Act 1976, section 7
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and selected metadata/annotations read. |
| Location | s7, especially (1), (3)–(5A) |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S47 · Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, section 82
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and selected metadata/annotations read. |
| Location | s82, especially (1)–(4); full body read |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S48 · Bail Act 1976, Schedule 1
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full Schedule1 body read; selected current annotations, not every act-wide effect. |
| Location | Part1; Part1A; Part2 paras1–6; Parts2A–3; selected current amendment annotations |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S49 · Sentencing Act 2020, section 224
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section and attached annotations read; relevant pending-effect metadata inspected. |
| Location | s224(1A), (4), (6); commencement and amendment annotations; unapplied-effect entries relating to s224 |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S50 · Online Safety Act 2023, section 179
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and relevant commencement annotation read; s180 exemptions not separately read. |
| Location | s179(1)–(7); commencement annotation |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S51 · How laws are made
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official parliamentary procedure guidance |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Returned page body read; institutional passage guidance. |
| Location | lines154–164 |
| Limit | Selected official guidance; no filing or adoption implied. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S52 · Malicious Communications Act 1988, section 1
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official revised provision |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full selected section body and relevant repeal annotations read. |
| Location | s1 remaining limbs and retained deleted text; s1(1)(a)(ii)–(iii), (2) repeal annotations |
| Limit | Where null, original commencement was not independently checked; the current selected revised body was read. Act/document-level modified and valid metadata are not a claim that this particular provision changed on those dates. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S53 · Public bills
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official parliamentary procedure guidance |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Returned substantive page body read, including government/backbench routes, stages and evidence. |
| Location | lines153–194 |
| Limit | Selected official guidance; no filing or adoption implied. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S54 · Private Members’ Bills
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official parliamentary procedure guidance |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Only returned substantive fragment read; not claimed as a full-page reading. |
| Location | lines153–158 |
| Limit | Selected official guidance; no filing or adoption implied. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S55 · Royal Assent
Open the cited material
| Field | Entry |
|---|
| Source layer | official parliamentary procedure guidance |
| Language | en |
| Document date | current selected text retrieved 2026-09-30 |
| Reading scope | Full returned page read; substantive passage and commencement body at listed lines. |
| Location | lines154–174 |
| Limit | Selected official guidance; no filing or adoption implied. |
| Access date | 2026-09-30 |
S56 · Elena Sannikova — courtroom report on the Dmitriyevskiy trial
Read the Russian courtroom report
Selected courtroom-report passage read, including the questioning of expert Teslenko about page 8 of expert report no. 697; publication heading, date and author read. Published 3 February 2006; accessed 30 September 2026.
A published courtroom report, not a newspaper facsimile, official transcript or complete expert report. The Russian wording is not presented as a backtranslation of the 2017 English judgment.