The 17 passages selected for the earlier author appendix, translated with the original omissions marked. These are retained historical selections, not 17 additional quotations in the current research supplement.
All passages below are English translations. Exact Russian source text and both sets of character ranges are retained in the matching JSON register.
Content, accuracy, and the grounds for claims may differ.
Quotation details
English range: 1679–1736; end excluded.
LQ02 · A13
No, […] differences cannot contain any accuracy because ACCURACY IS A WORD MADE OF LETTERS, show me the referent of accuracy without replacing it with another word? No […] description can be accurate
The marked omissions reproduce the earlier selection; the full translated passage is retained in the JSON register and corpus.
Quotation details
English range: 0–207; end excluded.
LQ03 · A14
This reply contains no separate demonstration of that kind.
Quotation details
English range: 198–257; end excluded.
LQ04 · A14
This example is not presented as meeting your demand to show a referent outside writing: what is being compared is precisely what is written.
Quotation details
English range: 1319–1460; end excluded.
LQ05 · A18
It must not be passed off as a verbatim original.
Quotation details
English range: 547–596; end excluded.
LQ06 · A18
removes part of its emotional expression
Quotation details
English range: 1188–1228; end excluded.
LQ07 · A19
Original is a word made of letters, emotional is a word made of letters
Quotation details
English range: 0–71; end excluded.
LQ08 · A21
The result is me
Quotation details
English range: 110–126; end excluded.
LQ09 · A25
The question is whether the letter I exists apart from any written instance of it
Quotation details
English range: 165–246; end excluded.
LQ10 · A29
I can be fictional, I can belong to AI and I can belong to different people — who will know whose letter “I” it is?
Quotation details
English range: 144–259; end excluded.
LQ11 · A30
Even when the label has been read and the selected assignment of reference is understood, what is written has not become what is named.
Quotation details
English range: 0–135; end excluded.
LQ12 · A31
The word “distinguishing” is a written word, putting it somewhere in a text does not mean distinguishing appears - d i s t i n g u i s h i n g - strokes put together into letters that form the word distinguishing do not become any distinguishing.
Quotation details
English range: 285–531; end excluded.
LQ13 · A31
“отчёта и процедуры” — two written words with the letter и in between.
Quotation details
English range: 532–602; end excluded.
LQ14 · A31
Text belongs in text.
Quotation details
English range: 899–920; end excluded.
LQ15 · A32
Ending does not require a final word that permits an ending.
Quotation details
English range: 1869–1929; end excluded.
LQ16 · A33
And another question, don't you think this research could be left as just the self-check and an explanation
Or what do you think?
Quotation details
English range: 0–130; end excluded.
LQ17 · A34
And the research could be built around “human and AI” interaction
Meaning I would be the subject