Archive of external-link access observations

Historical document from an earlier edition. The counts and outstanding tasks below describe that package. See the later edition’s status and the source register.

On 30 September 2026, direct requests to 42 external URLs retrieved the first bytes of each response: 37 returned HTTP 200 and five returned HTTP 403. Response status is not a finding about the truth of a document or its support for a claim. Reading scope is recorded separately in the source ledger.

The five URLs that refused direct requests host judicial texts that could be read through another retrieval channel. They are not marked as missing sources. The access record also identifies full retrieved versions for beforeword, Counterman and Kimel/Canese.

Address	Observation
S01 Dmitriyevskiy v Russia	HTTP 200; response received
S02 Dmitriyevskiy official press release	HTTP 200; response received
S03 Stomakhin v Russia	HTTP 200; response received
S04 Counterman v Colorado	HTTP 200; response received
S05 People v Counterman	HTTP 403 direct request; judicial text read through another retrieval channel
S06 Brandenburg v Ohio	HTTP 200; response received
S07 Chambers v DPP	HTTP 200; response received
S08 Cobban and Borders v DPP	HTTP 200; response received
S09 Wunsiedel 1 BvR 2150/08	HTTP 200; response received
S10 Eon v France	HTTP 200; response received
S16 Shreya Singhal v Union of India	HTTP 403 direct request; judicial text read through another retrieval channel
S17 Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India	HTTP 403 direct request; judicial text read through another retrieval channel
S18 Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam & Anr — larger-bench reference	HTTP 403 direct request; judicial text read through another retrieval channel
S19 Arup Bhuyan v State of Assam & Anr — disposal and Record of Proceedings	HTTP 403 direct request; judicial text read through another retrieval channel
S20 Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission and Another	HTTP 200; response received
S21 Momberg v S	HTTP 200; response received
S22 Kimel v. Argentina ES	HTTP 200; response received
S23 Kimel v. Argentina EN	HTTP 200; response received
S24 Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay ES	HTTP 200; response received
S25 Ricardo Canese v. Paraguay EN	HTTP 200; response received
S11 CCPR/C/GC/34	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/record-boundaries	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/inscription-and-reading	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/no-authority-in-the-output	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/horizon	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/diagnostic-record	HTTP 200; response received
S14 Russia ceases to be party to the Convention	HTTP 200; response received
S26 J L Austin How to Do Things with Words selected extracts	HTTP 200; response received
S27 Lawrence M Solan Judicial Decisions and Linguistic Analysis Is There a Linguist in the Court	HTTP 200; response received
S28 Michael Kranzlein Nathan Schneider Kevin Tobia CuRIAM	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/human	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/evaluation	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/mathematics-phases-0-7	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/full-stop	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/reading-as-enclosure	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/view-from-outside	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/understanding	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz/research/written-i	HTTP 200; response received
S12 Communications Act 2003 section 127	HTTP 200; response received
S13 Online Safety Act 2023 section 181	HTTP 200; response received
S15 beforeword previous research	HTTP 200; response received
beforeword.xyz	HTTP 200; response received

Internal package paths and HTML anchors are checked against the final files. PDF links to HTML appendices require the extracted package. The standalone article PDFs retain external source links.

beforeword · 30 September 2026